Installation went fast for both Windows and Linux, and you can run Alfresco with JBoss Portal 2.2 or Apache Tomcat. For most
of my testing I used Windows Server 2003 and Tomcat. The main Alfresco work area continues to be well organized, with breadcrumbs
to jump around quickly and summary areas that show available actions. Additionally, each user can create custom views to their
documents and tasks. On top of this, Alfresco 2.1's portlet container enables users to access their spaces, tasks, documents,
and Web Forms from JSR-168-compliant portals.
After creating user accounts and shared spaces (which can be further broken down by language), I started my Web Content Management
(WCM) tests by using Adobe Dreamweaver CS3 to design Web pages and style sheets. Further, the CIFS (Common Internet File System)
feature let me drag and drop these assets, existing Web pages, and rich media into the repository. I liked the new Web 2.0
user interface that let me conveniently zoom into a folder or content in any space – then preview Microsoft Office files,
images, and video.
You may not need to do a lot of development because there's a nice library of sample forms for entering content (articles,
news flashes, and multimedia) and site components (navigation, recent items, RSS feeds, site maps, and mashups) that add functionality
to pages. I also published Alfresco content to WordPress and TypePad blogs.
Administration, a traditional Alfresco strength, is now even better. Using wizards, I quickly built a library of custom SmartWebForms.
These enabled content contributions to enter and submit material in the correct format. Editorial workflows (created the same
way) kept reviewers informed, using e-mail notification, of pages they needed to approve. As before, Alfresco includes extensive
rules that automate both routine and complex tasks. For example, in a few steps I created a rule to watch a space for newly
approved documents and convert them into PDF files.
Other changes in Version 2.1 let me check for broken links, set a time when content is to be published, and expire content.
The previous version enhanced content deployment in some important ways. For example, I published a Web site to multiple servers.
For even more efficiency, Alfresco's transactional deployment function pushed recent content updates (rather than publishing
a whole folder or site section). Additionally, the software now tracks these individual changes and there's immediate rollback
to prior versions of a site.
Effortless document capture
Underlying WCM is Alfresco Document Management, which I accessed from the common work area. Users can also interact with documents
from other interfaces they may already know, including shared drives, portals, WebDAV, and FTP.
A smart folder structure similar to what you'd find when working with Web content holds documents – which enabled me to create
rules to reduce manual processing. For instance, after users responded to an "approve/reject" e-mail, Alfresco moved the draft
document to the appropriate folder and performed any additional steps.
I liked the way Alfresco automatically extracted metadata from documents and then categorized them. Afterward, the Google-like
OpenSearch (available from Internet Explorer 7 or Firefox) helps users find material quickly in the repository.
 |
| The Bottom Line |
Alfresco Community Edition 2.1 Alfresco Software, alfresco.com
|
Excellent 9.2 |
 |
| criteria |
score |
weight |
| Ease-of-use |
9 |
25% |
 |
| Features |
10 |
25% |
 |
| Security |
9 |
15% |
 |
| Scalability |
9 |
15% |
 |
| Management |
8 |
10% |
 |
| Value |
9 |
10% |
 |
|
 |
Cost: Free under GPL 2 with FLOSS exception
Platforms: Windows and Linux
Bottom Line: This very inclusive offering, developed using Java, sits on top of a JSR-170 content repository. Out of the box Alfresco provides
a Web portal framework; CIFS (file share) interface that works on Windows and Linux clients; and a Web-content management
system –- plus document, imagine, and records management. Further, Alfresco scales well with options for deploying content
to multiple servers.
|
 |
About our Reviews and Scoring Methodology
|
|
 |
| The Bottom Line |
DotNetNuke 4.4.5 DotNetNuke, dotnetnuke.com
|
Very Good 8.4 |
 |
| criteria |
score |
weight |
| Ease-of-use |
9 |
25% |
 |
| Features |
8 |
25% |
 |
| Security |
8 |
15% |
 |
| Scalability |
9 |
15% |
 |
| Management |
8 |
10% |
 |
| Value |
8 |
10% |
 |
|
 |
Cost: Free under BSD-style license
Platforms: ASP.Net, Windows Server, SQL Server 2005
Bottom Line: Written in VB.Net, DotNetNuke is an extensible content management system suitable for intranets, extranets, and public Web
sites. The core distribution includes three dozen CMS modules, including a skin system (based on simple templates) that separates
design from content, personalization, and search; other modules range from e-commerce systems and photo galleries to blogs,
forums, and wikis. Commercial publishers offer other components.
|
 |
About our Reviews and Scoring Methodology
|
|
 |
| The Bottom Line |
Drupal 5.2 Drupal, http://www/drupal.org
|
Very Good 8.3 |
 |
| criteria |
score |
weight |
| Ease-of-use |
8 |
25% |
 |
| Features |
8 |
25% |
 |
| Security |
9 |
15% |
 |
| Scalability |
8 |
15% |
 |
| Management |
8 |
10% |
 |
| Value |
9 |
10% |
 |
|
 |
Cost: Free under GPL
Platforms: Apache or IIS Web servers; Unix, Linux, BSD, Solaris, Windows, or Mac OS X; PHP; PHP-supported database server (MySQL or PostgreSQL)
Bottom Line: Written in PHP, Drupal's Web application framework anchors a content management system that includes modules for e-commerce
and workflow. Drupal, unlike other systems, also has a taxonomy system to classify content – but this does take extra work
to configure (as does setup). Themes are created with the standard PHPTemplate engine. A blogging system makes this system
good for building online communities.
|
 |
About our Reviews and Scoring Methodology
|
|
 |
| The Bottom Line |
Plone 3.0 Plone Foundation, plone.org
|
Very Good 8.6 |
 |
| criteria |
score |
weight |
| Ease-of-use |
9 |
25% |
 |
| Features |
8 |
25% |
 |
| Scalability |
8 |
15% |
 |
| Security |
9 |
15% |
 |
| Management |
9 |
10% |
 |
| Value |
9 |
10% |
 |
|
 |
Cost: Free under GPL
Platforms: Windows, Mac OS X, BSD, Solaris, and SuSE
Bottom Line: The Plone CMS, which is built on top of the Zope application server, performs well for intranets – as well as a document management
server and team collaboration tool. The system is easy to use and also notable for its multi-lingual capabilities. Additionally,
Plone powers a number of high-traffic Internet sites, though this configuration should included additional components, such
as Squid caching.
|
 |
About our Reviews and Scoring Methodology
|
|