Free Newsletters
Technology & Business Daily

InfoWorld
Log-in | Register

Blade server shootout: Dell vs. HP vs. Sun

InfoWorld's head-to-head comparison proves blade servers are sharp enough for enterprise use


Ten blades fit into a single Dell chassis, resulting in a single rack density of 60 dual-socket systems. With the soon-to-be-released quad-core Intel chips, this equates to 240 cores per rack, with a maximum power draw of 3.6 kW.


03FEblades-ph4.gif
Click for larger view.
Each blade sports two 2.5-inch SAS or SATA hot-swap drives with hardware RAID0/1, expanding up to 32GB of DDR2 RAM and dual or quad-core CPUs. The external I/O layout is similar to the HP solution, with integrated switching across a passive midplane and either an integrated Cisco 3030 or a Dell PowerConnect 5316M gigabit blade switch module. Straight gigabit Ethernet pass-through modules are available, as well.

On the FC (Fibre Channel) side of the aisle, you have both McData and Brocade 4GB FC switch modules available, as well as a pass-through module. The PowerEdge 1955 handles InfiniBand with a Topspin pass-through module providing a single port per blade.

In the lab, our PowerEdge 1955 chassis sported a PowerConnect 5316M switch, which is accessible at the console level via the chassis management tool's CLI. Of the 16 ports on the switch, 10 are reserved for blades at one port per blade, and the other six are broken out into RJ45 ports on the back of the module.

We successfully trunked this module to a Cisco 4948-10G switch to provide 6Gb of throughput to the main lab network. It would be nice to see 10 Gigabit Ethernet support in this chassis, but then, none of the blade systems we evaluated could do 10 Gig — yet.

Access made easy
One of the Dell system's unique features is the integrated KVM switch. It's a Dell-branded Avocent switch that has internal connections to each blade, and breaks out into a standard PS/2 and VGA port via a dongle on the back of the chassis. This permits quick and easy direct KVM access to each blade, and can uplink to another KVM switch relatively easily.

03FEblades_dell.jpg
Further, this same KVM module doubles as an Avocent digital KVM port, permitting instant integration into another Avocent/Dell KVM switch to make management even easier. Each blade also has a front-mounted dongle connector that can support a directly connected monitor and keyboard. It's the best direct (non-IP) console management of any blade system.

The PowerEdge 1955 Blade System would be quite at home in a standard datacenter running a single server per blade, in an HPC environment serving as a low-footprint collection of compute nodes, or in a virtualization scenario (the Intel VT extensions are available, but disabled by default). In fact, when VMware Virtual Infrastructure Server 3 was evaluated in the lab, VMware engineers chose to use the Dell chassis to run all their tests — partly because the Sun Blade 8000 system was still in use re-running the SPEChpc tests, but also because they were sure that there were no compatibility issues with the Dell blade system, and it had the performance levels they needed.

Paul Venezia is senior contributing editor of the InfoWorld Test Center and writes The Deep End blog.
Continued
« PREVIOUS PAGE | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | NEXT PAGE » 

 The Bottom Line

Dell PowerEdge 1955 Blade System
Dell, dell.com

Very Good  8.3
criteria score weight
Availability 8 25%
Performance 9 20%
Scalability 9 20%
Management 7 15%
Serviceability 8 10%
Value 8 10%

Cost:
$75,622 as tested, including 10 blades, external InfiniBand switch, cabling

Platforms:
Linux, Windows Server 2003

Bottom Line:
Dell’s PowerEdge 1955 surprised us in the SPEChpc tests, turning in the best score by far, and it offers unique features such as the embedded Avocent KVM. In spite of being the smallest chassis (7U) in the test, it offers a significant amount of processing power. The management can run stand-alone or integrated into Dell’s OpenManage framework, but isn’t terribly impressive either way. All things considered, the PowerEdge 1955 offers the best bang for the buck.

About our Reviews and Scoring Methodology

 The Bottom Line

HP BladeSystem c-Class
HP, hp.com

Very Good  8.3
criteria score weight
Availability 8 25%
Performance 8 20%
Scalability 9 20%
Management 8 15%
Serviceability 9 10%
Value 8 10%

Cost:
$66,902 as tested with eight blades

Platforms:
Linux, Windows Server 2003

Bottom Line:
HP’s brand-new quad-core Intel blades made their debut in this test, delivering eight total cores across two sockets in each half-height blade. The c-Class offers an impressive 16 blades per 10U chassis, and an equally impressive array of I/O options, including integrated Cisco switching modules. We did see some relatively minor hardware problems in the lab, possibly due to the pre-release status of the blades. Overall, the c-Class is solidly built and reasonably priced for a high-end blade system.

About our Reviews and Scoring Methodology

 The Bottom Line

Sun Blade 8000 Modular System
Sun Microsystems, sun.com

Very Good  8.2
criteria score weight
Availability 8 25%
Performance 7 20%
Scalability 9 20%
Management 9 15%
Serviceability 8 10%
Value 8 10%

Cost:
$101,000 as tested with four blades

Platforms:
Solaris x86, Linux, Windows Server 2003

Bottom Line:
Sun’s system is more of a consolidated server structure than true blades. Each server module offers a four-socket Opteron mainboard with up to 64GB of RAM, and Sun fits 10 modules into a 19U chassis that’s just bursting with I/O options. Its surprisingly poor performance in the lab is likely due to poor optimization on the SPEChpc tests. Either way, it cost Sun on the final score -- but the blades are impressively powerful, and a great match for a virtualization infrastructure.

About our Reviews and Scoring Methodology


Talkback:

commentPost a Comment

 

MOST COMMENTS

 
 





Beyond AntiVirus: Symantec Endpoint Protection
Today's threats to the endpoint are much more dangerous as they rapidly evolve to evade traditional security measures. To combat these threats, companies should supplement existing security with proactive behavioral based technologies. Join this webcast to learn about Symantec's next generation AntiVirus solution that provides that level of protection. Sponsor: Symantec

»  Click here to view this Webcast
  Zombie PCs Are Attacking Your LAN
A recent study showed that malware-infected zombie PCs are now a bigger threat to ISPs and Web infrastructure than DoS attacks. As this brand new IT Strategy Guide explains, an increased use of peer-to-peer techniques by the attackers has made it harder to fight back. Download now, compliments of Verio:

»  Click here to download now

- Special Advertising Partners -
WHITE PAPERS
 

» Technology White Papers Library

Technology White Papers by Topic

Technology White Papers E-mail Alert

Find out when the latest white paper is available:
 
 
INFOWORLD MARKETPLACE
 
» BUY A LINK NOW
 
 

Video

 
 
 

Podcasts

 
 
 

 

Columnists

 
 
 

Resource Center


Ads by techwords beta  [See your link here]
 




Sponsored Technology Links

 
 
 HOME  NEWS  BLOGS  PODCASTS  VIDEOS  TECHNOLOGIES  TEST CENTER  EVENTS  CAREERS   About | Advertise | Awards | RSS | Contact Us 

Copyright © 2008, Reprints, Permissions, Licensing, IDG Network, Privacy Policy, Terms of Service.
All Rights reserved. InfoWorld is a leading publisher of technology information and product reviews on topics including viruses,
phishing, worms, firewalls, security, servers, storage, networking, wireless, databases, and web services.

CIO :: ComputerWorld :: CSO :: Demo :: GamePro :: Games.net :: IDG Connect :: IDG World Expo
Industry Standard :: IT World :: JavaWorld :: LinuxWorld :: MacUser :: Macworld :: Network World :: PC World :: Playlist