That rack had better have plenty of power and cooling, though, as the Sun Blade 8000 draws a significant amount of juice,
requiring approximately 9kW (actual draw is generally lower). That's quite a lot compared with the HP and Dell blades, which
pull roughly 3.6kW each. Luckily, the Sun system's density makes up for its power thirst.
It took Sun's engineers quite some time to get the tests up and running, and the Sun Blade 8000's results in the SPEChpc benchmark
weren't the best. They did better in the SPECseis test, and I'm certain that if they were given more time to optimize the
other two tests, Sun's overall results would have been much better.
Sun's X8400 Server Modules are large, each with two 2.5-inch SAS or SATA drives and a RAID0/1 controller. Memory expands to
64GB per blade with 4GB DIMMs, granting a fully populated chassis a total of 640GB of RAM across 40 sockets. Those sockets
can hold Opteron 870s at 2.0Ghz, 875s at 2.2Ghz, or 885s at 2.6Ghz, all with 1MB L2 cache. And last week, Sun announced availability
of AMD Rev F processors in its new X8420 Server Modules.
I/O options are plentiful. Each blade can handle as many as six different external I/O forms, and there are two different
methods of delivering the physical I/O ports to the blades themselves. The X8400 is more focused on pass-through ports than
using integrated switching; it has wide Network Express Modules that aggregate a single 8x PCI Express lane from each blade,
as well as smaller Express Modules also leveraging a single 8x PCI Express lane, but built into the slim PCI-SIG form factor.
These smaller modules reside at the top of the chassis, and are designed to provide more granular I/O access to each blade.
The two NEM modules in our test unit delivered four gigabit Ethernet ports to each blade. The InfiniBand interfaces slotted
into the Express Modules, delivering two InfiniBand ports to each blade on a single module. This design is quite flexible
and its hot-swap capability is certainly attractive.
Although the Sun Blade 8000 is technically a blade system, it fits the image of a modular server system. The raw horsepower
available across each blade's four sockets and the impressive array of modular I/O options position the system directly into
the HPC and virtualization arena. This is not a system to run simple Web or directory servers — unless they're virtualized.
Virtualization-ready
Because of its power, the Sun Blade 8000 really doesn't compare directly to the other blade systems in the test. The Dell
and HP solutions can go three ways (standard server builds, HPC, and virtualization) but the Sun solution finds its sweet
spot in HPC, high-end database, and virtualization tasks.
 |
| The Bottom Line |
Dell PowerEdge 1955 Blade System Dell, dell.com
|
Very Good 8.3 |
 |
| criteria |
score |
weight |
| Availability |
8 |
25% |
 |
| Performance |
9 |
20% |
 |
| Scalability |
9 |
20% |
 |
| Management |
7 |
15% |
 |
| Serviceability |
8 |
10% |
 |
| Value |
8 |
10% |
 |
|
 |
Cost: $75,622 as tested, including 10 blades, external InfiniBand switch, cabling
Platforms: Linux, Windows Server 2003
Bottom Line: Dell’s PowerEdge 1955 surprised us in the SPEChpc tests, turning in the best score by far, and it offers unique features such
as the embedded Avocent KVM. In spite of being the smallest chassis (7U) in the test, it offers a significant amount of processing
power. The management can run stand-alone or integrated into Dell’s OpenManage framework, but isn’t terribly impressive either
way. All things considered, the PowerEdge 1955 offers the best bang for the buck.
|
 |
About our Reviews and Scoring Methodology
|
|
 |
| The Bottom Line |
HP BladeSystem c-Class HP, hp.com
|
Very Good 8.3 |
 |
| criteria |
score |
weight |
| Availability |
8 |
25% |
 |
| Performance |
8 |
20% |
 |
| Scalability |
9 |
20% |
 |
| Management |
8 |
15% |
 |
| Serviceability |
9 |
10% |
 |
| Value |
8 |
10% |
 |
|
 |
Cost: $66,902 as tested with eight blades
Platforms: Linux, Windows Server 2003
Bottom Line: HP’s brand-new quad-core Intel blades made their debut in this test, delivering eight total cores across two sockets in each
half-height blade. The c-Class offers an impressive 16 blades per 10U chassis, and an equally impressive array of I/O options,
including integrated Cisco switching modules. We did see some relatively minor hardware problems in the lab, possibly due
to the pre-release status of the blades. Overall, the c-Class is solidly built and reasonably priced for a high-end blade
system.
|
 |
About our Reviews and Scoring Methodology
|
|
 |
| The Bottom Line |
Sun Blade 8000 Modular System Sun Microsystems, sun.com
|
Very Good 8.2 |
 |
| criteria |
score |
weight |
| Availability |
8 |
25% |
 |
| Performance |
7 |
20% |
 |
| Scalability |
9 |
20% |
 |
| Management |
9 |
15% |
 |
| Serviceability |
8 |
10% |
 |
| Value |
8 |
10% |
 |
|
 |
Cost: $101,000 as tested with four blades
Platforms: Solaris x86, Linux, Windows Server 2003
Bottom Line: Sun’s system is more of a consolidated server structure than true blades. Each server module offers a four-socket Opteron
mainboard with up to 64GB of RAM, and Sun fits 10 modules into a 19U chassis that’s just bursting with I/O options. Its surprisingly
poor performance in the lab is likely due to poor optimization on the SPEChpc tests. Either way, it cost Sun on the final
score -- but the blades are impressively powerful, and a great match for a virtualization infrastructure.
|
 |
About our Reviews and Scoring Methodology
|
|