Free Newsletters
Technology & Business Daily

InfoWorld
Log-in | Register

Blade server shootout: Dell vs. HP vs. Sun

InfoWorld's head-to-head comparison proves blade servers are sharp enough for enterprise use


That rack had better have plenty of power and cooling, though, as the Sun Blade 8000 draws a significant amount of juice, requiring approximately 9kW (actual draw is generally lower). That's quite a lot compared with the HP and Dell blades, which pull roughly 3.6kW each. Luckily, the Sun system's density makes up for its power thirst.


03FEblades-ph3.gif
Click for larger view.
It took Sun's engineers quite some time to get the tests up and running, and the Sun Blade 8000's results in the SPEChpc benchmark weren't the best. They did better in the SPECseis test, and I'm certain that if they were given more time to optimize the other two tests, Sun's overall results would have been much better.

Sun's X8400 Server Modules are large, each with two 2.5-inch SAS or SATA drives and a RAID0/1 controller. Memory expands to 64GB per blade with 4GB DIMMs, granting a fully populated chassis a total of 640GB of RAM across 40 sockets. Those sockets can hold Opteron 870s at 2.0Ghz, 875s at 2.2Ghz, or 885s at 2.6Ghz, all with 1MB L2 cache. And last week, Sun announced availability of AMD Rev F processors in its new X8420 Server Modules.

I/O options are plentiful. Each blade can handle as many as six different external I/O forms, and there are two different methods of delivering the physical I/O ports to the blades themselves. The X8400 is more focused on pass-through ports than using integrated switching; it has wide Network Express Modules that aggregate a single 8x PCI Express lane from each blade, as well as smaller Express Modules also leveraging a single 8x PCI Express lane, but built into the slim PCI-SIG form factor. These smaller modules reside at the top of the chassis, and are designed to provide more granular I/O access to each blade.

03FEblades_sun.jpg
The two NEM modules in our test unit delivered four gigabit Ethernet ports to each blade. The InfiniBand interfaces slotted into the Express Modules, delivering two InfiniBand ports to each blade on a single module. This design is quite flexible and its hot-swap capability is certainly attractive.

Although the Sun Blade 8000 is technically a blade system, it fits the image of a modular server system. The raw horsepower available across each blade's four sockets and the impressive array of modular I/O options position the system directly into the HPC and virtualization arena. This is not a system to run simple Web or directory servers — unless they're virtualized.

Virtualization-ready
Because of its power, the Sun Blade 8000 really doesn't compare directly to the other blade systems in the test. The Dell and HP solutions can go three ways (standard server builds, HPC, and virtualization) but the Sun solution finds its sweet spot in HPC, high-end database, and virtualization tasks.

Paul Venezia is senior contributing editor of the InfoWorld Test Center and writes The Deep End blog.
Continued
« PREVIOUS PAGE | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | NEXT PAGE » 

 The Bottom Line

Dell PowerEdge 1955 Blade System
Dell, dell.com

Very Good  8.3
criteria score weight
Availability 8 25%
Performance 9 20%
Scalability 9 20%
Management 7 15%
Serviceability 8 10%
Value 8 10%

Cost:
$75,622 as tested, including 10 blades, external InfiniBand switch, cabling

Platforms:
Linux, Windows Server 2003

Bottom Line:
Dell’s PowerEdge 1955 surprised us in the SPEChpc tests, turning in the best score by far, and it offers unique features such as the embedded Avocent KVM. In spite of being the smallest chassis (7U) in the test, it offers a significant amount of processing power. The management can run stand-alone or integrated into Dell’s OpenManage framework, but isn’t terribly impressive either way. All things considered, the PowerEdge 1955 offers the best bang for the buck.

About our Reviews and Scoring Methodology

 The Bottom Line

HP BladeSystem c-Class
HP, hp.com

Very Good  8.3
criteria score weight
Availability 8 25%
Performance 8 20%
Scalability 9 20%
Management 8 15%
Serviceability 9 10%
Value 8 10%

Cost:
$66,902 as tested with eight blades

Platforms:
Linux, Windows Server 2003

Bottom Line:
HP’s brand-new quad-core Intel blades made their debut in this test, delivering eight total cores across two sockets in each half-height blade. The c-Class offers an impressive 16 blades per 10U chassis, and an equally impressive array of I/O options, including integrated Cisco switching modules. We did see some relatively minor hardware problems in the lab, possibly due to the pre-release status of the blades. Overall, the c-Class is solidly built and reasonably priced for a high-end blade system.

About our Reviews and Scoring Methodology

 The Bottom Line

Sun Blade 8000 Modular System
Sun Microsystems, sun.com

Very Good  8.2
criteria score weight
Availability 8 25%
Performance 7 20%
Scalability 9 20%
Management 9 15%
Serviceability 8 10%
Value 8 10%

Cost:
$101,000 as tested with four blades

Platforms:
Solaris x86, Linux, Windows Server 2003

Bottom Line:
Sun’s system is more of a consolidated server structure than true blades. Each server module offers a four-socket Opteron mainboard with up to 64GB of RAM, and Sun fits 10 modules into a 19U chassis that’s just bursting with I/O options. Its surprisingly poor performance in the lab is likely due to poor optimization on the SPEChpc tests. Either way, it cost Sun on the final score -- but the blades are impressively powerful, and a great match for a virtualization infrastructure.

About our Reviews and Scoring Methodology


Talkback:

commentPost a Comment

 

MOST COMMENTS

 
 





Virtualization: A Step by Step Approach to Success
Your virtual machines can be up and running in a matter of minutes. HP and Citrix have integrated XenServer with HP ProLiant servers and management tools, powered by hardware-assisted Intel Virtualization Technology to enable high- performance, cost-savings solutions for server consolidation and disaster recovery. Sponsor: HP

»  Click here to view this Webcast
  Zombie PCs Are Attacking Your LAN
A recent study showed that malware-infected zombie PCs are now a bigger threat to ISPs and Web infrastructure than DoS attacks. As this brand new IT Strategy Guide explains, an increased use of peer-to-peer techniques by the attackers has made it harder to fight back. Download now, compliments of Verio:

»  Click here to download now

- Special Advertising Partners -
WHITE PAPERS
 

» Technology White Papers Library

Technology White Papers by Topic

Technology White Papers E-mail Alert

Find out when the latest white paper is available:
 
 
INFOWORLD MARKETPLACE
 
» BUY A LINK NOW
 
 

Video

 
 
 

Podcasts

 
 
 

 

Columnists

 
 
 

Resource Center


Ads by techwords beta  [See your link here]
 




Sponsored Technology Links

 
 
 HOME  NEWS  BLOGS  PODCASTS  VIDEOS  TECHNOLOGIES  TEST CENTER  EVENTS  CAREERS   About | Advertise | Awards | RSS | Contact Us 

Copyright © 2008, Reprints, Permissions, Licensing, IDG Network, Privacy Policy, Terms of Service.
All Rights reserved. InfoWorld is a leading publisher of technology information and product reviews on topics including viruses,
phishing, worms, firewalls, security, servers, storage, networking, wireless, databases, and web services.

CIO :: ComputerWorld :: CSO :: Demo :: GamePro :: Games.net :: IDG Connect :: IDG World Expo
Industry Standard :: IT World :: JavaWorld :: LinuxWorld :: MacUser :: Macworld :: Network World :: PC World :: Playlist