IT always seems to be caught in the middle of the WAN-performance battle: On one hand, users never seem to be happy with an
application’s performance; on the other, the bean counters won’t budget for bigger pipes. If more bandwidth isn’t the answer
to end-users’ performance problems, then what is?

Riverbed Steelhead with RiOS 3.0
Riverbed Technology, riverbed.com
|
Excellent 9.0 |
 |
| criteria |
score |
weight |
| Performance |
9 |
40% |
 |
| Protocol support |
9 |
25% |
 |
| Reliability |
9 |
15% |
 |
| Setup |
9 |
10% |
 |
| Value |
9 |
10% |
 |
|
 |
Cost: Steelhead 200, $4,995; Steelhead 5520, $69,995; Steelhead 6020, $119,995
Platforms: Any Ethernet-based network with TCP/IP and UDP traffic
Bottom Line: Riverbed continues to impress with expanded CIFS and NFS support, allowing for better performance with both Windows- and NFS-based
servers. QoS can now be enforced in the appliance with policies based on bandwidth and latency. Reporting also saw upgrades,
as did the pre-population service to help eliminate cold hit penalties. Detection and correction of asymmetric routes is a
definite plus.
|
 |
About our Reviews and Scoring Methodology
|
|
|
|
The solution to improving both response time and circuit utilization is to make the connection more efficient and to reduce
the effects of latency. I’ve watched a whole new breed of WAN optimization and acceleration appliances come to market during
the past few years, and I’ve seen firsthand what a difference intelligent optimization can make on WAN response time.
Once again, I had Riverbed's Steelhead WAN acceleration and optimization appliances on my test bed, and true to form, the company provided excellent improvements
with little tweaking. Release 3 of the RiOS (Riverbed Optimization System) shows a more mature product, with the focus on
improving existing features, the addition of greater application support, and much increased capacity. During its time on
my bench, Steelhead proved again that it is more than capable of making oversubscribed WAN circuits appear faster than they
were while greatly reducing response time, besting previous releases by as much as 20 percent.
I tested three Steelhead appliances: the 200, the 5520, and the 6020. The 5520 (offering 155Mbps of optimized throughput and
15,000 TCP connections) and the 6020 (boasting 310Mbps of optimized throughput and 40,000 TCP connections) are hardware platforms
released this year -- as are their cousins, the 3020 and the 3520.
I set up the 5520 as the branch-office appliance and the 6020 as the datacenter unit. (The complete solution requires at least
two appliances.) The impish 200 (1Mbps of optimized throughput and 100 TCP connections) came into play during testing of optimization
of asymmetric routes (more on this later). My trusty Shunra VE simulated my various WAN conditions, and D-Link DGS-3324SR
Gigabit switches tied it all together.
Maturing Gracefully
RiOS has always included optimizations for CIFS and MAPI aimed at reducing the protocols’ chattiness. In RiOS 3, Riverbed
builds on this solid foundation with the addition of NFS streamlining. As with CIFS traffic, there is a lot of protocol overhead
with NFS that can degrade application response time significantly. RiOS 2.1 performed NFS optimization via data and transport
streaming; RiOS 3 does NFS application streaming, allowing for read-ahead and metadata pre-fetching. Unfortunately, I do not
have any NFS performance numbers from previous releases, but Riverbed’s internal testing shows a 10-fold improvement in RiOS
3. CIFS traffic gained an improvement of between three and six times compared with last year’s testing.
CIFS traffic also received additional application-specific acceleration for programs -- such as SolidWorks, Visio 2003, and
SolidEdge -- that open a file multiple times during a single operation. Previously, Steelhead would not optimize subsequent
requests for the locked file, erring on the side of data integrity. The new CIFS mode, called overlapping opens, allows Steelhead
to continue to optimize CIFS traffic even though Windows has the file locked, improving response times even under these conditions.