It’s an undeniable problem. Many IT sites lack uniform access to unstructured data locked away in ECMSes (enterprise content
management systems), workflow software, and other repositories. Data in these systems is frequently accessible only through
the vendors’ proprietary interfaces, and so federating it is difficult.

IBM WebSphere Information Integrator Content Edition v. 8.3
IBM, ibm.com
|
Good 7.7 |
 |
| criteria |
score |
weight |
| Ease-of-use |
9 |
30% |
 |
| Features |
8 |
30% |
 |
| Integration |
7 |
20% |
 |
| Performance |
6 |
10% |
 |
| Value |
6 |
10% |
 |
|
 |
Cost: Priced per CPU and per connector to ECM; starts at $75,000 for a one-CPU system with one connector
Platforms: Java running on Windows, Linux, Solaris, IBM AIX
Bottom Line: IBM’s IICE is a capable means of federating access to portals and content management systems. It offers convenient access
to their many features via an easy-to-use GUI. Its enterprise orientation and pricing, however, precludes its use in SMBs.
Performance, too, could be improved.
|
 |
About our Reviews and Scoring Methodology
|
|
|
|
Search engines do a terrific job of federating search access, but they merely provide read access. For plenary access, sites
need a product that not only locates content but can add, modify, delete, and manage data items through a uniform interface.
IBM’s WebSphere IICE (Information Integrator Content Edition) v. 8.3 provides just this capability for ECMSes from IBM itself
(DB2 Content Manager, WebSphere Portal Document Manager, and Lotus Notes), IBM’s recently acquired FileNet (P8), Documentum Content Server, Open Text Livelink, Stellent Content Server, and Interwoven Team Suite, among others. IICE also provides read-only access to IBM DB2 and Oracle databases, as well as DBMSes that can connect through other IBM products.
Because of the complexity of setting up substantial content repositories on multiple platforms for testing purposes, I reviewed
IICE at IBM’s site — so this review isn’t hands-on in the traditional sense. Nonetheless, I got a good sense of the features
and benefits, and it is clear that IICE is a robust and expansive solution. I was impressed with IICE’s capabilities, but
was taken aback by its hefty price tag and disappointed that it doesn’t integrate with more systems.
IICE is generally deployed in conjunction with IBM’s other information and data management solutions. However, it is just
as comfortable being a stand-alone package. In the former configurations, IICE serves either as a front end to an ECMS or
as a middle layer between users and back-end systems containing unstructured data.
IICE works with content repositories by relying on their own proprietary APIs to do the work. For example, to search ECMSes,
a user will enter the search terms on an IICE console. The package then runs the search against all the content management
systems using their interfaces, normalizes the returned results, and displays them in a Google-like interface. IICE transparently
handles single sign-on — with integration with LDAP and Active Directory — for authorization, and it relies on the respective
back ends to enforce access control.
IICE does not display search data until all searches are complete, which unfortunately puts performance at the mercy of the
slowest back-end system. You may remove a given system from a search, but there is no option for displaying partial search
results in the name of speed. In a simple demo across four back-end systems, we waited several minutes for a search to complete,
because one repository was hosted on a severely underpowered platform.
Contributing to this slowness is the fact that IICE does not maintain an index of items found on the back ends, nor does it
cache searches or results. IBM attributes this design to IICE’s focus on completeness of search results, rather than speed.
If fast searches are important, IBM recommends its OmniFind edition, but I don’t buy this either/or paradigm. Users would be well served by options that allows them to tune activities between
performance and completeness.
After the results have been displayed on the console, users can modify the data. For example, highlighting an item in IICE
can be saved to the CMS via IICE. The product also exposes administrative options to these repositories — most data manipulation
capabilities that the system provides are passed through to the user in an integrated UI.
The underlying technology that makes this all possible is a Java package IBM obtained in its 2004 acquisition of Venetica.
The software can run on its embedded J2EE server or on an existing IBM WebSphere or BEA WebLogic server. It integrates with
the various repositories via connectors or Web services. Developers can write applications that interact with these connectors
and even write new connectors for unsupported systems — an SDK is supplied for this purpose.
I was disappointed that IICE does not support CRM, despite specific claims that it does so. Rather, IICE can be said to complement
a CRM application by federating access to all the documents, records, and images that might form part of a customer’s relationship
— but this benefit exists only if a bridge is first written between the CRM software and IICE. And you have to write this
bridge yourself — astonishingly, IBM provides no off-the-shelf bridges for the three or four extant CRM packages.
IICE’s primary benefit is providing a federated means to search, retrieve, manage, and administer data items in repositories
and ECMs. It does this well and uses an easy-to-understand interface, so users will become productive quickly. For enterprises
with heterogeneous ECMs, IICE is an attractive solution.
That said, there’s no doubt that IICE is heavily enterprise-oriented. It accesses only large ECM systems; smaller repositories
that an SMB might use are pointedly not supported. The product is priced on a per-CPU and per-connector basis, with prices
starting at a $75,000 for one CPU and a single connector. Because it makes no sense to buy IICE unless you need two or more
connectors, expect to spend more for even a minimal system. At these price levels, IICE’s enterprise ambitions are obvious.
All in all, I was impressed with how well IICE’s federation works and its good bidirectional support for content modifications
and data management. This last aspect is especially intuitive, as is the passel of administrative features. However, more
options for controlling performance, integration with more packages, and less aggressive pricing would make this product far
more attractive.