Panelist Cliff Schmidt, vice president of legal affairs at Apache, responded with a good word for pure open source organizations.
"That's the key thing. You can't buy Apache and you can't buy Eclipse," Schmidt said.
But Milinkovich defended Oracle, saying he himself was "acquired" by Oracle when Oracle bought TopLink from WebGain in 2002.
Ninety people moved over from WebGain to Oracle as part of the acquisition, according to an Oracle Web page.
"It's a developer-focused organization," internally, Milinkovich said.
He cited market share as a reason for Oracle to buy JBoss. Panelist Chris DiBona, open source programs manager at Google,
said he believes Oracle's JBoss intentions are about serving companies that use JBoss.
In the audience was Oracle's Ken Jacobs, executive vice president of product strategy, who complimented Milinkovich and DiBona.
"I think both of you articulated very well why Oracle is interested in open source," Jacobs said.
Working with open source organizations presents a challenge for commercial companies, according to Cooper. "You have to deal
with other companies' opinions," she said. "That means you can't push an agenda the same way."
Milinkovich was critical of how open source vendors participating in the conference had a business strategy of dual licensing.
The big money in open source is when companies build products on top of open source offerings from communities such as Apache
or Linux, he said.
Google benefits from open source by using Linux, DiBona noted. Given its large volume of hardware, it would have been tough
for Google to pay for an OS, he said. "At [that] point, I think it would have made sense for us to write our own [OS]," DiBona
said. But Google's use of open source is not only about cost savings; the company believes that open source levels the playing
field in the industry, he said.
One audience member asked how panelists make money when they volunteer for Apache. "You have a day job," Cooper responded.
Wu said she was a graduate student; Schmidt is a consultant.
Between 80 percent and 85 percent of persons working on Eclipse projects are paid salaries by their employers who send them
to work for Eclipse, Milinkovich said.