VMware has dominated the virtualization market for some time. But the company is scrambling to stay ahead of an increasingly
competitive landscape that includes Microsoft and Linux vendors. In an interview with Computerworld, VMware President Diane
Greene talked about how working with the open-source community could help her company stay ahead.
Where would you like to see improvement, or new direction, in your core technology, ESX? We're looking forward to having our
core technology go out with the VT [Intel's Virtualization Technology] and Pacifica [from AMD].
What will Pacifica and VT technology do for your virtualization technology? It will reduce the [performance] overhead of CPU
virtualization. They will make the CPU virtualization run even better, thus opening up the market even more.
As Microsoft and Linux vendors start shipping virtualization within their products, how are you going to keep your customers
from switching? We are working well with the open-source community. We see ourselves as complementary in working together.
We have a pretty phenomenal track record of bringing out major new functionality on a regular basis. And we have a very big
road map of more things to do along that way. We are going to continue moving our stuff forward. We are going to continue
our partnerships with the community at large. We announced this community source [program] to allow our partners to participate
more fully, and we have resell arrangements with all the x86 hardware vendors. ... Customers are going to have the broadest
array of choice and flexibility.
People wonder whether Microsoft will have the an impact on VMware similar to what happened to Netscape in the browser battle.
Are there any lessons learned in what happened to Netscape? We see some differences between us and Netscape. One, the technology
involved is much deeper. There's a lot more complexity and robustness requirements on it as well. No one cared if a browser
crashed. And we have very strong partnerships with the hardware community, which Netscape was not able to do. We continually
try to work with Microsoft because we think we are bringing them a lot of value. We're helping move Windows into the data
center, which we think is a very good thing for them.
What are you trying to do with the open-source community? We are making sure that Linux runs really well with our products.
And we regularly contribute to the open-source community, too.
While XenSource has not yet released a product, do you see them as a potential competitor? I don't know where they are going
to play, because we haven't seen the robustness, performance and functionality of their products. We are certainly saving
our customers huge amounts of money today ... and will continue to lead. We also launched an initiative around APIs to standardize
some things around virtual machines, like how the OS runs in the virtual machine or what the disc format of the virtual machine
is. And we certainly want to partner with XenSource and Microsoft in those areas.
What are you doing with Sun Microsystems? We are supporting Solaris x86 in a virtual machine. We have had a lot of customers
show a great deal of interest in that.
Are there any other operating systems you would like to support? We would love to support a Mac OS. They've announced that
they are going to move to the Intel platform -- that's the only reason I say that.
How important is R&D for you -- what percentage of your revenue is being spent there? It's a huge investment for us. I can
say we spend well above the norm. We plow our money back into R&D.
What's your relationship with EMC? What difference has it made to VMware's life? We operate as a completely independent subsidiary.
We're not integrated. And this has been very important for us to do, because we're all about heterogeneity within the x86
ecosystem. Having a parent like EMC has allowed us to be comfortable to continue to do bold things.