See correction at end of article
Companies large and small routinely set their expectations of computer systems according the capabilities of Intel-based x86
computers and 32-bit Windows. We’re due for a shift in standards.
Enter Apple, which got the bright idea of taking a pair of 64-bit IBM PowerPC CPUs, jacking them into server-class internal
buses, and squeezing the whole thing into a desk-side tower chassis. The result, the Power Mac G5, delivers on the present
need for rapid computing, deep multitasking, and responsive user interfaces — as well as the future need (current for some,
including myself) for mainstream computers that rapidly process and analyze massive data sets.
If you’re on the edge of your seat waiting for a characterization of the Power Mac G5’s performance, here it is: Comparing
official Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPEC) dual-processor throughput tests with the unofficial numbers on
Apple’s Web site, the 3.06GHz Xeon bests the 2GHz Power Mac G5 by some margin.
But wait, doesn’t Apple call the Power Mac G5 the world’s fastest PC? Yes, and I think that characterization was a big mistake
from the beginning. The x86 architecture has the Intel compiler suite on its side. The Intel compilers are used to create
most commercial and performance-sensitive applications for x86 software running on Windows and Linux. Apple won’t beat it
until IBM gets serious about an architecture-tuned compiler for OS X.
Apple’s marketing choices aside, I believe that I/O throughput, especially memory performance, is infinitely more important
than raw computing speed. Using the University of Virginia’s Stream memory bandwidth benchmark, the Power Mac G5 moves data almost twice as fast as a dual-processor 3.06GHz Xeon system: 2.2GB per second versus 1.3GB
per second. (By way of comparison, memory throughput on a 17-inch PowerBook is 535MB per second.) I’m not cutting Apple special
slack. Solid processing power and maximum bandwidth rule the day, and the Power Mac G5 has that combination down.
In a dual-processor Power Mac G5, the cost of talking to peripherals is also reduced substantially by the machine’s efficient
and highly integrated system chip set. With the Power Mac G5, the penalty for accessing data that’s not in the CPU cache is
reduced to a degree not possible with Xeon.
The Power Mac G5 takes the throughput flag, and it’s got something else you can’t get on the Xeon: the Panther OS (aka OS
X 10.3). The client version firms Apple’s lead in graphics, boosting the performance of overall rendering and dramatically
improving the display speed of PDF files. Panther server tightens links to Windows and Unix networks; reworks its directory
services around open standards and a high-speed database; and adds a unified management interface that controls, among many
other things, the new mail server, a Microsoft-compatible VPN, and streaming video services. As has long been true, the Mac
is the platform to beat for client Java. Panther Server includes the open-source JBoss J2EE application server, complete with
graphical administration and monitoring. The Panther client is beautiful and practical, while the server is powerful and painless.

Power Mac G5
Apple Computer, apple.com
|
Excellent 8.8 |
 |
| criteria |
score |
weight |
| Connectivity |
10 |
20% |
 |
| Ease-of-use |
10 |
20% |
 |
| Performance |
7 |
20% |
 |
| Expandability |
8 |
15% |
 |
| Serviceability |
9 |
15% |
 |
| Value |
8 |
10% |
 |
|
 |
Cost: Starts at $1,799; $4,498 as tested
Platforms: Includes Mac OS X 10.3 (Panther) client operating system; Mac OS X Server 10.3 operating system is optional
Bottom Line: The Power Mac G5 desktop workstation presents the ideal balance of compatibility, performance, usability, and value. It has
serious number-crunching capabilities, but this machine most clearly outshines Intel-based systems when performing complex
operations on massive disk and/or RAM-based data sets.
|
 |
About our Reviews and Scoring Methodology
|
|

Mac OS X 10.3 (Panther)
Apple Computer, apple.com
|
Excellent 9.2 |
 |
| criteria |
score |
weight |
| Ease-of-use |
9 |
20% |
 |
| Manageability |
9 |
20% |
 |
| Performance |
9 |
20% |
 |
| Standards |
9 |
20% |
 |
| Setup |
10 |
10% |
 |
| Value |
10 |
10% |
 |
|
 |
Cost: Bundled with new systems; $129 for new license; $199 for pack of five
Platforms: PowerPC-based notebooks, desktops, and servers running G3, G4, or G5 processors
Bottom Line: The previous version of Mac OS X, Jaguar, trounced Windows for glamour and overall functionality. Panther adds fast user-switching,
rapid selection among open applications and windows, and a faster Mail client with threaded viewing. The most important new
feature is the incredible improvement in the speed and quality of rendered graphics, especially PDF and HTML text.
|
 |
About our Reviews and Scoring Methodology
|
|

Mac OS X 10.3 (Panther) Server
Apple Computer, apple.com
|
Excellent 9.3 |
 |
| criteria |
score |
weight |
| Performance |
9 |
20% |
 |
| Services |
9 |
20% |
 |
| Standards |
10 |
20% |
 |
| Availability |
8 |
10% |
 |
| Manageability |
9 |
10% |
 |
| Setup |
10 |
10% |
 |
| Value |
10 |
10% |
 |
|
 |
Cost: Bundled with Xserve rack systems; $499 for 10-client edition; $999 for unlimited clients
Platforms: Most PowerPC G3- or G4-based systems with at least 128MB of RAM
Bottom Line: The BSD Unix-based Mac OS 10.3 Server is the easiest commercial Unix to set up, configure, and manage, yet Apple cut no corners
on services. Multiprotocol file sharing, Windows Primary Domain Controller functionality, powerful Open Directory, client
and server Java, graphical server and workgroup management, and fault recovery are among a long list of standard features.
|
 |
About our Reviews and Scoring Methodology
|
|