Dale Sweitzer, a network administrator for Crossville Ceramics in Tennessee, has hit a rough patch -- or series of rough patches
to be exact.
Sweitzer, who handles security for 160 geographically dispersed PCs running Microsoft Corp. software, says that he spends
more time and money applying software patches than he does doing almost anything else on the job, and he's not alone.
Although vendors like Microsoft have been working recently to simplify software patch delivery, the problem remains a critical
one for IT administrators who are struggling to keep up with all the patch work.
From filling security holes to upgrading features, the act of applying patches, or putting a new piece of software code over
an old one -- has become for many a full time job.
"Patching is a nightmare," said Alex Bakman, founder and chief executive officer of patch management provider Ecora Corp.
The recent onslaught of security threats like Blaster and Slammer, have only aggravated the problems administrators face,
he said.
According to Bakman, it takes an average of 30 minutes to apply a patch to each machine in a company's system, and hundreds
of patches have been released by various vendors so far this year. Companies are selecting which patches they need to apply
because their IT staff is already spending two to three hours a day patching systems, Bakman said.
"The current frustration level is incredibly high," Bakman said.
Of course, patching is just a symptom of the wider problem with software, users say, which is the gradual and seemingly endless
discovery of new security vulnerabilities which must be patched and fixed throughout the software's lifetime, requiring an
enormous amount of time and money.
"The total cost of ownership of software is incalculable," Sweitzer noted.
Vendors blame insecure code. However, eradicating patches by creating flawless software is impossible with imperfect humans
writing software code.