The Liberty Alliance next week will announce two new draft specifications and for the first time turn over a portion of its
work to a standards group providing the first evidence that efforts to create a standards-based identity management framework
may be fragmenting.
Liberty
will announce at next week’s RSA Conference that the first phase of its work, which was completed in June 2002 and updated
in January, will be turned over to the Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS). The first
phase, which was renamed Identity Federation Framework (ID-FF) in March, is basically Liberty’s Version 1.1 specification
that outlines single sign-on and account sharing between partners with established trust relationships.
The
Liberty
move may be a reaction to IBM Corp. and Microsoft Corp., who are not
Liberty
members, but are trying to create their own federated identity management framework built on WS-Security, an evolving Web services standard they created and submitted
to OASIS.
"I fear that the IBM/Microsoft Web Services Security Group and the Liberty Alliance have passed the point of no return in
that they can no longer get together and create a common model for federated identity," says Dan Blum, an analyst with the
Burton Group. "Above WS-Security, they are not sharing similar components."
Draft specifications for Liberty’s second and third phases of work, which now incorporate the WS-Security protocol for securing
Web services messages, also will be introduced at RSA and will outline how to build a permission framework and sets of services
for user identities that can be shared across the Internet. The second phase of
Liberty
’s work, called Identity Web Services Framework (ID-WSF), will allow islands of trusted partners to link to other islands
of trusted partners and provide users with the ability to control how their identity information is shared. Phase 3, called
Identity Services Interface Specifications (ID-SIS), will build services on top of ID-WSF.
The two draft specifications are not being submitted to OASIS at this time but will be opened to the usual public review.
"I think it is significant that Liberty is ready to open up to a wider world than its own group," says Prateek Mishra, co-chair
of the Security Services technical committee at OASIS and director of technology and architecture at Netegrity, a Liberty
Alliance member.
Liberty
’s Version 1.1 specification will become a foundation document to help create Version 2 of OASIS’s Security Assertion Markup
Language (SAML), according to sources. SAML 1.0 is a standard for exchanging authentication and authorization information
and is incorporated into and extended by
Liberty
’s Version 1.1. The hope is that ID-WSF and ID-SIS will eventually extend SAML 2.0 to create a single standards-based environment
for federated identity and sharing of identity credentials.
Work on SAML 2.0 will begin at the end of June, according to Mishra.
Handing Version 1.1 over to OASIS is a milestone because
Liberty
, which has 160 members, is now fully aligned with SAML and OASIS after claiming previously that it was a de facto standards
organization.
Liberty
’s change of heart may be a preemptive strike in a developing clash with Microsoft and IBM, which have combined to create
a palette of Web services specifications. The duo’s work has lead to some clashes with other standards efforts, including
those for reliable messaging and business process workflow.
The Microsoft/IBM tandem is working on a specification, called WS-Federation, for brokering and creating trust between partners
in a federated environment similar to ID-WSF.
WS-Federation is a module the tandem is developing for WS-Security and is one of six extensions to WS-Security, including
WS-Policy and WS-Trust that were introduced in December, that now squarely overlap with Liberty and its commitment to build
higher level identity services by extending SAML.
With
Liberty
also incorporating WS-Security into its base specifications, it is now clear
Liberty
and IBM/Microsoft are starting from the same point but taking divergent paths toward identity management.
"Within the next family of specifications the Liberty Alliance has made use of WS-Security," confirms Michael Barrett, president
of the Liberty Alliance management board and vice president of Internet technology strategy at American Express. "But at the
Alliance
we don’t have the not-invented-here syndrome. We feel an open-end consortium is better than the proprietary approach."
In March, the
Alliance
created a new blueprint of its work that broke
Liberty
’s monolithic specification into three components of identity management that can evolve separately and be used together or
independently. That blueprint allows vendors to implement the technology as it is created instead of waiting for one monolithic
specification. The blueprint also allowed
Liberty
to submit just a portion of their work to OASIS.
"As our thinking evolved we realized that network identity was a set of components," Barrett says.
The component approach is much the same approach that Microsoft and IBM are taking as part of their WS-Security roadmap, introduced
in April 2002.
The new Phase 2 Liberty draft specification component, ID-WSF, which was previously called Version 2.0, will complement ID-FF.
The Phase 3 specification, ID-SIS, will build a set of interoperable services like registration profiles, contact books, geo-location
or alert services on top of the ID-WSF. The first ID-SIS will be ID-Personal Profile, which will define a basic profile template
that can be used to build a registration service.
The two draft specifications will include some 20 new features and capabilities.
Liberty
hopes to have final drafts later this year.
Liberty
also plans an interoperability demonstration at the RSA Conference next week with some 18 vendors that have implemented Version
1.1 of the
Liberty
specification, including Novell, Sun, Ericsson and Communicator.