MANAGEMENTSPEAK: You've brought up an excellent point.
TRANSLATION: You've brought something embarrassing up, but luckily I've got a glib answer.
-- IS Survivalist Christian De Meco makes an excellent point.
A MONTH BACK I wrote about the dilemma of properly filling out the "Race" field of various forms now that the concept of
race has been scientifically laid to rest (see
Survival Guide
, May 27). Readers of this column suggested two useful alternatives: "Human" and "440-meter relay."
As you might imagine, a column on race in IT provoked more commentary than just that. So:
No, I didn't say hair, eye, and skin color aren't heritable. I said they don't follow one another around in the population.
Race is only meaningful if different heritable traits are linked.
Why did I except affirmative action from my overall position that race is irrelevant? That race is a demonstrably useless
concept bears on how you hire and promote employees. Affirmative action -- an attempt to provide remediation for institutionalized
disadvantages, not to confer arbitrary, unfair advantage, by the way -- is a matter of public policy. That puts it beyond
the scope of this column. To clarify: In my role as an InfoWorld columnist, I'm neither endorsing nor rejecting affirmative
action.
A few readers raised a fascinating point: Whereas they work hard to avoid racial and ethnic bigotry, they feel quite comfortable
with cultural bias. Me, too. Some cultures I can't coexist with at all. And even among the wide variety of cultures most of
us find completely benign, different ones promote wildly different values. Ethnicities whose cultures extol academic achievement,
hard work, and creative problem solving, for example, will almost always end up with more collective sustainable wealth than
others that don't, even in the complete absence of bigotry, making the public-policy issues enormously complicated. The impact
on how you hire and promote is, however, minimal: Except as adjusted by your employer's affirmative action policy, base both
decisions purely on merit.
At the staff level, IT is pretty diverse. IT management is less heterogeneous. Racism at work? Several readers of varying
ethnicities suggested a more subtle mechanism. Executives and managers frequently have protégés -- individuals they consider
especially promising and whose career paths they metaphorically pave.
Being more comfortable with someone in my-group than someone in not-my-group isn't racism. It's human nature, and my-group
isn't something most people define consciously. So here's my challenge: First, figure out if you have a protégé -- you might
without even realizing it. If you do, ask yourself this perhaps uncomfortable question: Is he or she the most promising individual
in your team, or merely the one you're most comfortable with?